集成电路技术分享

 找回密码
 我要注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
查看: 1929|回复: 2

altera公司的这两种器件的安全性如何?其解决方案又如何?如何保护器件的ip!

[复制链接]
ccs 发表于 2010-5-25 20:21:20 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
altera公司的这两种器件的安全性如何?其解决方案又如何?如何保护器件的ip!
fpga 发表于 2010-5-25 20:24:57 | 显示全部楼层
When programming MAX, user can turn on a secuirty option which prevents programming image from reading out of the device. Regarding FPGA in general, such as Cyclone, because of its high density and routing complexity, it is extremely difficult as they do not know exactly the internal architecture of the device. Even if people can reverse the bit stream to derive the LUT structure of the design, , to try to reverse it back to the original gate level logic, not to talk about the RTL or architectural level, it would be near to impossible. If they are concerned with people just copying the FPGA content and reproduce the same board, they can put a small portion of the design into a CPLD.
Sunlife 发表于 2015-5-19 15:55:33 | 显示全部楼层
When programming MAX, user can turn on a secuirty option which prevents programming image from reading out of the device. Regarding FPGA in general, such as Cyclone, because of its high density and routing complexity, it is extremely difficult as they do not know exactly the internal architecture of the device. Even if people can reverse the bit stream to derive the LUT structure of the design, , to try to reverse it back to the original gate level logic, not to talk about the RTL or architectural level, it would be near to impossible. If they are concerned with people just copying the FPGA content and reproduce the same board, they can put a small portion of the design into a CPLD.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

QQ|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|fpga论坛|fpga设计论坛 ( 京ICP备20003123号-1 )

GMT+8, 2025-5-6 20:39 , Processed in 0.058557 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表